Derek Lee Johnson
Career management
Research Paper: Equity Theory
Equity is defined as the quality of being fair or impartial,
fairness: impartiality. The antonyms:
bias, discrimination, inequity, injustice, partiality, partisanship, prejudice,
unfairness, unreasonableness: injustice. (Dictionary). In this paper I will discuss
in detail how equity and equity theory in the context of work motivation
operates.
The definition for equity implies fairness and impartiality.
Inequity or bias describes the exact opposite. Organizations impose
discriminatory practices on employees in a wide variety of ways. Whether implicitly
or explicitly research and historical data confirms this notion.
Access discrimination prevents certain groups from possibly
being hired or even promoted. Treatment discrimination denies certain groups
and individual the ability for upward mobility or entry into organizations. The
harsh reality is that minorities face hourly, daily, and year after year work
place discrimination. Covert exclusion masked by a plethora of mechanism.
Stereotyping is one element underlining organizational
inequities. Systemic racism is the root lingering beneath the surface of this
reality. According to Greenhaus, “Negative stereotyping can produce biased
assessment of members of targeted groups and can play a role in decisions
regarding promotion, salary increase, and job assignments.” (Greenhaus).
Unfortunately, the level at which stereotypes reside in the human psyche has
inconsequential relevance to the victims of this social program. “Cultural
similarity produces feelings of psychological closeness between people in a
relationship, whereas dissimilarity in cultural background and experience may
produce a feeling of psychological distance.” (Greenhaus).
This cognitive revelation fails to invigorate the diminished
opportunities of equally capable and competent minority employees.
“Psychological distance and even fear because of the belief that people who are
different from us are more difficult to understand and therefore more difficult
to predict.” (Greenhaus).
It is important to note how psychological distance can easily
translate into self- fulfilling prophecy. This lack of understanding gives
birth to misinterpretation of a person’s reaction to bias.
“Equity theory is based in the idea that individuals are
motivated by fairness, and if they identify inequities in the input or output
ratios of themselves and their referent group, they will seek to adjust their
input to reach their perceived equity.” (Study).
Equity theory is manifested via comparison ratios, with
salary being the most used comparison. Those compared to are referred to as
referent groups in which there are four groups: “Self-inside; your own
experience within your current organization. Self-outside; your own experience
within another organization. Other-inside; other people within your current
organization. Others-outside; other people outside your current organization.”
(Study).
Fairness acts as a modifying condition as does the lack of fairness
initiate a sense of inequity. Input and output are important terms used in
equity theory that should be understood. “Typically inputs include time, effort,
loyalty, hard work, commitment, ability, adaptability, flexibility, tolerance,
determination, enthusiasm, personal sacrifice, trust in superiors, support from
co-workers and colleagues.” (Your).
These are attributes that a person may display and create a
portrait of positivity. “Outputs in equity theory are defined as the positive
and negative consequences that an individual perceives a participate has
incurred as a consequence of his/her relationship with another. Outputs are job
security, esteem, salary, employee benefits, expenses, recognition, reputation,
responsibility, sense of achievement, praise…” (Your).
Payment is the principle equity discrepancy. Economic
dissatisfaction propelled by perceived bias in pay distribution is very common.
Equity theory refers
to referents as those who are being compared too. Demographically the wealth and
power distribution makes the referent group most often white males.
It would be fair to surmise that African-American have
disproportionately experienced more equity bias in the workplace than white
males or white females. In African –American communities we understand this as
being institutional/systemic racism, albeit normalcy in American society.
Equity theory in the context of work motivation contends that
perception is the linchpin that activates a comparison with referents. However,
long before entering the work place minorities specifically Black people have
experienced generational discrimination in institution and organizations in
America.
Organizations of employment use direct discrimination and
indirect discrimination. Direct discrimination can be simply treating certain
people less favorably. Indirect discrimination can simply be developing
policies that places a certain group at a disadvantage.
“In common day-to-day interaction, being treated unfairly
because of ones’ personal characteristics produces wide-ranging deleterious
impact on mental and physical health such as anxiety, psychological distress,
various cardiovascular effects, poor self-reported health status, and low birth
weight in infants of mothers experiencing discrimination.” (Hammond).
This research points to a segment of our society who
experience discrimination/inequities literally every day in and outside of the
work environment.
“Discrimination is a
complex phenomenon with adverse consequences at personal and organizational
levels. Past studies have demonstrated that workers who are victims of
discrimination might show less job satisfaction, less organizational commitment
and worse levels of health and productivity.” (Di Marco).
In conclusion, equity theory in the context of work
motivation appears to concentrates on the responsive aspect of perceived equity
(in the work place) and implies that the outcome will determine motivational
factors. An alternative view is that experiencing inequities (outside and in
the work place) from childhood to adulthood might influence certain individuals
work motivation.
References
2.
Di
Marco, D. Cabrera,RL. Arenas, A. Giorgi, G. Arcanegeli, G. and Mucci, M. Approaching the Discriminating Work
Environment as Stressor: The Protective Role of Job Satisfaction. Published
online (2016).
3.
Greenhaus,
J.H., Callanan, G.A. & Godshalk, V.M. 2010. Career Management 4th
Edition, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
4.
Study.com>academy>lesson>equity,
Equity Theory of Motivation in Management Definition & Examples.
6.
Hammond,
W.P., Gillen, G., & Yen, I.H. Workplace Discrimination and Depressive
Symptoms: A Study of Multi-Ethnic Employees (2010).